Tuesday, July 29, 2014

The State of Migrant Workers in Korea under President B.S. Aquino


27 July 2014, Seoul, South Korea

1. “Kung uuwi kami ng Pilpinas wala kaming trabaho doon, kaya kahit mahirap ang buhay artista dito sa Korea habang hindi pa nahuhuli dito na muna kami.” This is a familiar word from non-documented Overseas Filipino Workers (OFWs) in South Korea, saying that they have decided to stay on in Korea even though they have overstayed their visas and have become non-documented, because it will be extremely difficult for them to find jobs in the home country. Forced migration through the Labor Export Policy remains one of the major sources of government revenues and in spite of the much hyped high gross domestic product (GDP) of the country reaching to 7.5 in 2013, yet still many Filipinos are compelled to leave their home and community to seek jobs overseas.

2. In South Korea, due to impact of global economic crisis on various industries and on income of families belonging to the low and middle income families, the government’s immigration bureau fiercely conduct crackdown on non-documented migrant workers. South Korea’s Employment Permit System (EPS) as labor policy for migrant workers since its inception in 2004 has been proven as form of modern day slavery if not a legalized human trafficking wherein migrant workers have to work from 10-12 hours per day or more and are exposed to the dangerous working conditions and often experience physical and psychological abuse done by their employers. It perpetuates easy supply of cheap labor force from labor sending countries and failed to provide humane and non-discriminatory working environment for migrant workers and instead of reducing the number of migrant workers who become non-documented it has in fact increased due to only three job transfers during their term of employment.

3. The Philippine Embassy here in Seoul, South Korea has failed to negotiate for better working conditions for OFWs. It has found subservient to the host country’s policies and even when rights are migrants and marriage migrants are violated they hesitate to do proper actions such as mediating to stop the bureau of immigration’s crackdown or proposed strategies to legalize non-documented migrant workers. The Embassy in South Korea is not different from other countries that have concentration of OFWs, it bows down to the exploitative schemes of employers and profit-orientation of host countries and lacks genuine interest to give aid and assistance to migrant workers in distress, whose rights and welfare were the reasons for the creation of such government offices.

4. Meanwhile organizations of OFWs in Korea have opposed attempts of both the South Korean and Philippine governments to divest OFWs of the direct benefits of their pension immediately after their term of employment ends through the ‘equalization scheme’ of SSS-NPS agreement. In the same way, migrant workers organizations from various countries have raised their opposition to the revision of the EPS provisions on payment of their severance pay which originally given prior to departure from the country but has been attempted that this will be paid after departure. Protests on this revision has stopped the Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL) from finally revising the provision for this benefits of migrant workers.

5. There in the home front, President B.S. Aquino has not instituted social justice for the people, but rather preoccupied himself in pleasing his political allies and his own party, a political practice that feeds on graft and corruption. His government has tried so hard to hide the ugliness and rottenness of the political and economic system and that fiscal management of the nation has been abused especially at the high places of the executive and legislative powers, where funds intended for social development of the nation such as the Presidential Development Assistance Fund (PDAF) and recently the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) were are all found unconstitutional. There has been a conscious collusion of financial managers and the President B.S. Aquino in the irregular appropriation of such funds.

6. Since B.S. Aquino started his term in 2010 as president of the country, there has been an increaisng number of OFWs deployed that reached to 1.5. million, 3.4.% higher than in 2009. This is an indicator that the government has not created significant amount of decent jobs for millions of Filipinos and it satisfies itself with the regular monthly remittances of OFWs that buttress the national economy and releases government from responsibility of providing quality social services for the people. Migrante International pegs the number of overseas Filipinos between 12 to 15 million, to include non-documented OFWs.

7. This government at home, while emphasizing local job generation as its core program to reduce unemployment, continues to take pride in the “remittance boom” to further promote labor export. To do this, it has become more aggressive in lobbying for job markets abroad in the past four years. Even funds for labor outmigration management through agencies such as the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration and the Overseas Workers Welfare Administration (OWWA) are directly sourced from OFWs or recruitment agencies and employers through various fees. However, the so-called remittance boom does not necessarily translate to economic growth, nor does it automatically translate to higher investments or economic relief for families of OFWs.

8. OFWs have been subjected to state exactions which caused OFWs and their families to become debt-ridden, contributing greatly to the widespread landlessness and poverty of many. It is not unheard of for peasant families to mortgage or sell their small parcels of land or to submit their children to unpaid labor just to be able to pay debtors or produce the sum needed to pay for exorbitant pre-departure and placement fees. The continuous onslaught of state exactions on OFWs, combined with the BS Aquino government’s lack of welfare service and assistance to OFWs in distress and the overall economic conditions of OFWs and their families amid widespread corruption and criminal neglect of the government are enough reasons for Filipino migrants to call for BS Aquino to step down from office.

9. Worse of all the BS Aquino’s remorseless subservience to US-imposed policies and dictates has totally stripped the country of its sovereignty and independence, and has further endangered the lives of millions of OFWs around the world through signing into the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) which is paving the way for US re-occupation and re-colonization of the Philippines. Under the EDCA, a much bigger, uninhibited and unlimited number of US troops and their armaments are allowed to be stationed on Philippine soil. US troops can now easily set up base virtually anywhere in the country for an indefinite period of time.

10. KASAMMAKO declares that President Benigno Simeon Aquino III failed to institute social justice for the Filipino people and have not used government’s financial resources to better the lives of millions of people. We make the following calls to President B.S. Aquino and President Park Geun-Hye of the Republic of Korea and these are strategic imperatives to better the lives of the OFWs in South Korea and most importantly, so that justice, peace and sovereignty will reign in the lands:

We call on President B.S. Aquino to step down or get impeached.
Stop the crackdown of non-documented OFWs and all migrant workers in South Korea! Replace the Employment Permit System (EPS) with humane and non-dsicriminatory Work Permit System!

*Repeal the Enhance Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) that undermines Philippine soverieignty.
*Stop forced labor migration, create decent jobs at the home country and institute social justice.
*Stop extra-judicial killings and political repression of social activists including indigenous peoples who defend their lands from transnational and national mining corporations.
*Resume peace talks between the GRP and the NDFP
*Stop post deportation/departure payment of severance pay.


CARLO OLIVER
Chairperson

PHOTO credit: Kilusang Mayong Uno

Karapatan on BS Aquino's SONA: Delusions, lies, crocodile tears - all signs of a beleaguered President

Press Statement
July 29, 2014

Reference: Cristina “Tinay” Palabay, Secretary General, 0917-3162831
Angge Santos, Media Liaison, 0918-9790580

Karapatan on BS Aquino's SONA: Delusions, lies, crocodile tears - all signs of a beleaguered President


"The web of lies woven by BS Aquino during his SONA on the alleviation of poverty in the country, job creation, and immediate response to disasters reflects his disconnect with the real world. By all indications, the lives of the majority of Filipinos have deteriorated immensely under his watch. Shedding crocodile tears to gain the sympathy of the public is straight out of a poorly made script to save face amid rising people’s protests and three impeachment cases,” Cristina Palabay, secretary general of Karapatan said on BS Aquino’s SONA.


Karapatan also condemned the arrest of four activists during the SONA - Maria Luisa Garcia, 46, and Rosita Labarez, 57, of Controlled Economic Zone Federation; and Rodel, 33, and Rochel Ann Tortola, 12, of Migrante International, all resident of Bgy. Holy Spirit, Quezon City. A stun gun was used to immobilize Rodel and Rochel Ann Tortola, while they were inside a jeepney. All were released after intervention by Karapatan paralegals and lawyers from the National Union of People’s Lawyers.


"The repressive measures used against the protesters—the overkill presence of police and military, the layers of barriers and concertina wires and container vans, and the water cannon and stun guns are tell-tale signs of a beleaguered presidency. The layers of barricades literally and figuratively show the isolation of BS Aquino from the people," Palabay said.


"In just four years, Aquino has used up all of Cory’s magic," Palabay said. Aquino now faces three impeachment complaints for his presidential pork, the Disbursement Accelaration Program (DAP) and the signing of the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA) with the Obama Administration. "Caught with nothing to gain people's trust, BS Aquino resorted to emotional blackmail by again invoking the name of his parents," Palabay said.


"BS Aquino even had the gall to boast of the arrest of the Benito Tiamzon and Wilma Austria-Tiamzon when the arrest was a violation of the Joint Agreement on Security and Immunity Guarantees (JASIG) signed with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines. The peace negotiation between GPH and the NDFP has been stalled despite billions of pesos poured into the Office of the Presidential Adviser on the Peace Process (OPAPP)," Palabay said.


Karapatan has documented 204 victims of extrajudicial killings and 207 cases of frustrated killing committed under the Aquino regime. There are 99 victims of torture, 21 enforced disappearances and 504 political prisoners. "With Aquino’s desperation to stay in power and the full blast modernization of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, more rights violations will be committed as its protector, the AFP, sow terror to silence opposition," she said.


"But the Filipino people will bow down. With pride and courage, we will continue fight to break the bankrupt system which the rich and the powerful, like BS Aquino, benefitted from at the expense of the Filipino people," Palabay ended. ###
---------------------------------------------------------------------
PUBLIC INFORMATION DESK
publicinfo@karapatan.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------

Alliance for the Advancement of People's Rights
2nd Flr. Erythrina Bldg., #1 Maaralin corner Matatag Sts., Central District
Diliman, Quezon City, PHILIPPINES 1101
Telefax: (+63 2) 4354146
Web: http://www.karapatan.org


PHOTO credit: Kilusang Mayo Uno

Monday, July 21, 2014

Overcoming the Enemy

Meditation: Overcoming the enemy
by Frank J. Hernando
Delivered at the Filipino community, Zion Methodist Church
Seoul, Korea 20 July 2014

Scripture Text: Matthew 13:24-30; 36-43

1. I’m sure that you wondered that I posted on Facebook pictures taken in Hong Kong and I haven’t told you about it the last time I was here with you. I accompanied Gloria to Hong Kong and attended her meetings there as well related to program on marriage migrants, which has been evaluated under the auspices of the Asia-Pacific Mission for Migrants (APMM). It was an opportunity as well for us to mingle with the different organizations of Filipino domestic workers who spend their Sundays at the Central District of Hong Kong especially at Chatter Road and the surrounding places near St. John’s Anglican Church. It has been estimated that there are over 180,000 Filipino domestic workers in Hong Kong. Due to the hot weather in Summer, many Overseas Filipino Workers gather under shades of buildings such as the HSBC building near the Chatter Road. Other groups occupy the sidewalks for their meetings and socialization.

2. In the previous weeks and the last few days we are appalled and overwhelmed by so many perplexing events and issues in our country and the world. The recent typhoon that visited the Philippines made its devastating impact where several people killed due to strong winds, heavy rains and storm surges and 1.6 million people are still trying to recover from the severe impact to their livelihood and homes. There has been the political issue of Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) as irregular and unconstitutional. Then there has been Israel’s bombing of Gaza where many Palestinians mostly children and women died, and last Thursday evening Malaysian flight MH017 was downed by anti-aircraft missile in Ukraine killing all the 298 passengers and crew on board.

3. In this calamitous times, we inquire into our faith why do we and many people in the world have to go through all these threats and sufferings and death? Our Scripture texts gives a clue on how Jesus understood the world in which he lived in. The parable of the weeds and the wheat resonates the challenges to the kingdom of God wherein Jesus Christ represents the one who inaugurated it and the kingdom has been characterized as the growth of new faith and consciousness that was opposed to acquisitive and violent consciousness. The focus of the parable is the sower himself who generously sowed the wheat with the hope that a good harvest will come and that those who depend on the harvest for their sustenance will not be denied of the fruits of the land.

4. This parable has similarities with last Sunday's gospel reading, the parable of the sower, and Barbara Brown Taylor's made an eloquent rendering of it, I quote:

We emphasized that the parable is about God's gracious sowing over all kinds of soil. It's about God's unifying grace, not our divisiveness. In the parable, we have a Sower whose abundant sowing seems to indiscriminately gloss over the differences we like to hear about. In Jesus' explanation of the parable it seems to give them exactly what they want to hear, a judgmental focus on all the differences by focusing on the soils instead of the Sower. Moreover, before the explanation of the specific parable, Jesus gives them a general explanation of using parables which already plays right into the "us vs. them" ways reflected in their question in 13:10. And with tragic irony to boot. The disciples are the ones closest to the parable-giver. They get to see and hear everything firsthand. They are truly "blessed" in that regard (13:16). But are they also the ones who so hearing and seeing fulfill the prophecy: "'You will indeed listen, but never understand, and you will indeed look, but never perceive'" (13:14)? (unquote)

5. The parable in focus tells of the good seeds sown in the soil and when they sprang up there were too many weeds which the farmers wondered where did it come from and the Owner said it was the enemy who have sown the weeds while the farmers were asleep. More so the owner instructed them not to pull out the weeds because they may include the wheat as well. So they have to wait until harvest time when they can separate the wheat from the weeds and when separated the weeds are burned while the wheat are brought to the barn. The weeds and the wheat grow together until harvest time, a very vivid illustration of the coexistence of the good and bad and expresses the dualistic tendencies of human existence, that of separating the material from the metaphysical or spiritual aspects of life.

6. The biblical concept of last judgement is also heard in this parable represented in the act of harvest where the weeds are thrown into the fire to be burned. The time of judgement is indefinite, or classified as the kairos or the peak time and a time of God's choosing that can be a beginning of a new history or the coming of a new age or eon. There is not one kairos but many and it has occurred in the past and is happening in the present and in the future. The period between the planting and the harvest is the time when the enemy sows the weeds, at the same time when the goodness, grace and love of God grow in the lives of people. Here we get into the challenging situation where faith and practice of love and compassion of believers are tested in a refiner's fire. The enemy referred here is both internal and external force of influences in the life of Christians. It can be likened to the film title "Sleeping with the enemy". This simply means that while the kingdom of God grows in our individual lives, there are external factors and influences that pulls us to the violent, destructive and vindictive stances in life that the goodness in us has been defeated by the enemy within. Thus when the kairos time comes judgement falls like one is thrown into a furnace or hell like situation.

7. We all know how the hell like situations the high ranking official of the Philippines have been going through because of the scandalous misuse and corruption of government funds. President Aquino himself has been grilled because of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP). According to IBON News, President Benigno Aquino dispensed billions of pesos to legislators, agencies, local government units and beneficiaries at his discretion, for purposes that he defined unilaterally, and with only a semblance of legality. All these make the controversial DAP consistent with being pork barrel while not directly resulting in broad benefits to Filipinos, the group said. Pres. Aquino has admitted impatience with the prescribed budget process and short-cutting this to supposedly be able to deliver services more efficiently and immediately to the people. The profile of the projects funded by DAP do not fit with either delivering services to the people or stimulating the economy. The case of the DAP illustrates how the abuse of presidential powers and discretion makes hundreds of billions of pesos in public funds vulnerable to use for patronage and partisan politics and, at worst, corruption. (end)

8. Finally we who have been nurtured in the values of kingdom of God should not be discouraged of doing what is loving, what is just and what is compassionate that show forth the very person of Jesus Christ in our lives. Christians who matured in faith and live a just-righteous life be like blooms in Summer. The enemy or the those who work evil, destructive, violent schemes in our world today will be purged, but those who belong to Christ and live out their faith in acts of justice, love, mercy and peace will shine like the sun. I would add an important insight by N. T. Wright here, linking the righteous shining like the sun as one of the few references made by Jesus to resurrection by alluding to Daniel 12:3: "Those who are wise shall shine like the brightness of the sky, and those who lead many to righteousness, like the stars forever and ever" (Daniel also being the source for the "Son of Man" terminology). If we do read the "angels of the Son of Man" as those martyred in human fires of judgment, then they are also the resurrected righteous who shall someday shine like the sun. Therefore we should not be weary in doing good and in participating in the work of the kingdom of God. We are confident that we shall, in kairos time, overcome the enemy. Amen.

------------- -----------
Matthew 13:24-30; 36-43
13:24 He put before them another parable: "The kingdom of heaven may be compared to someone who sowed good seed in his field;

13:25 but while everybody was asleep, an enemy came and sowed weeds among the wheat, and then went away.

13:26 So when the plants came up and bore grain, then the weeds appeared as well.

13:27 And the slaves of the householder came and said to him, 'Master, did you not sow good seed in your field? Where, then, did these weeds come from?'

13:28 He answered, 'An enemy has done this.' The slaves said to him, 'Then do you want us to go and gather them?'

13:29 But he replied, 'No; for in gathering the weeds you would uproot the wheat along with them.

13:30 Let both of them grow together until the harvest; and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Collect the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn.'"

13:36 Then he left the crowds and went into the house. And his disciples approached him, saying, "Explain to us the parable of the weeds of the field."

13:37 He answered, "The one who sows the good seed is the Son of Man;

13:38 the field is the world, and the good seed are the children of the kingdom; the weeds are the children of the evil one,

13:39 and the enemy who sowed them is the devil; the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are angels.

13:40 Just as the weeds are collected and burned up with fire, so will it be at the end of the age.

13:41 The Son of Man will send his angels, and they will collect out of his kingdom all causes of sin and all evildoers,

13:42 and they will throw them into the furnace of fire, where there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth.

13:43 Then the righteous will shine like the sun in the kingdom of their Father. Let anyone with ears listen!
------------------------ ---------------------------
References:
1. http://www.textweek.com/
2. http://girardianlectionary.net/year_a/proper11a.htm
3. http://girardianlectionary.net/year_a/proper10a.htm#taylor
4. http://www.ibon.org/

Saturday, July 19, 2014

STOP THE AGGRESSION AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF PALESTINE! - Karapatan

July 14, 2014

STOP THE AGGRESSION AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF PALESTINE! - Karapatan

http://www.karapatan.org/STOP+THE+AGGRESSION+AGAINST+THE+PEOPLE+OF+PALESTINE%21

Karapatan Alliance for the Advancement of People’s Rights-Philippines vehemently condemns the heightening and continuing aggression against the people of Palestine through the intensifying indiscriminate aerial attacks the Israeli forces have launched in the Gaza strip, with the support of the United States government.

A repeat of the “Operation Cast Lead”(2008-2009) and the “Operation Pillar of Defense” (2012), “Operation Protective Edge” now has committed atrocious human rights violations as they systematically targeted civilians and their properties. According to Lt. Col Peter Lerner of the Israeli forces, 750 Hamas targets were hit over the past three days of the operation.

Reports from human rights NGO Palestinian Center for Human Rights in Palestine said homes of the Kaware family in Khan Younis in Southern Gaza Strip and the Mohammed Ahmed Hamad family in Beit Hanoun in Northern Gaza Strip were among those bombarded. In the Kaware home, 7 civilians, including 5 children, were killed; while 28 others who were around the house were injured. In the Hamad home, 6 members of the family, including 3 women were killed. There were also reports that a missile fired at a café in Khan Younis, where people were gathered watching the World Cup game, killed 6 people and injured 15. Ashraf al-Qidra reported that 77 Palestinians were killed and over 500 people were injured in the three days of aerial offensive in the Gaza strip. According to the Gazan health ministry spokesman most of the dead were children. It is reprehensible that such atrocious acts of aggression, violence and impunity are brought on the Palestinian people.

We are one with the calls of human rights organizations on the international community to immediately act to stop the Israeli offensive and protect Palestinian civilians. We also call for the prosecution of those who are accountable for their war crimes against Palestinian civilians.

We stand in solidarity with the people of Palestine in their struggle for sovereignty and for their homeland. We believe that it is the right of the Palestinian people to defend their lives and rights, amid the various violations of international humanitarian law and brutal aggression against their nation and their people.

We strongly condemn the vicious support of the US government, particularly the Barack Obama administration, for the aggression against the Palestinian people. It continuously egged on and justified these latest attacks against the Palestinian people. By its strong political and military support to the Israeli government, the US is equally guilty of the atrocities committed against Palestine. We call on Israel to stop all its offensives against Palestine.

We call on all freedom-loving peoples of the world to stand with people of Palestine in their just aspirations for liberation and against all forms of aggression. ###

Thursday, July 17, 2014

A World Without Forced Migration: Why migrants should support the call for development justice

A world without forced migration
Why migrants should support the call for development justice
International Migrants Alliance (IMA)
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development

Currently, there are 232 million international migrants in the world and this is projected to increase in the coming years. This includes migrant workers and immigrants who are mainly in agriculture, industries and the service sector. This number does not yet include the millions more irregular (or undocumented) migrants, as well as refugees.

Present-day migration is a result of inequities existing in the world perpetuated by policies of neoliberal globalization.

Migration pattern is mainly characterized by migration from less developed countries to the more developed ones such as the migration of people from Latin American and the Caribbean to North America, from Southeast Asia to the richer countries of East Asia, from South Asia to the Middle East, or Eastern Europe to Russia and to Western Europe.

The past four decades of implementing neoliberal globalization policies has deepened the maldevelopment of third world countries. The destruction of agriculture, deindustrialization, and contraction of public social services in the country of origin of migrants has led to mass displacement, dislocation and forced migration.

It has also heightened the need for a more “flexible” skilled, cheap, disempowered labour force that are sourced from the less developed countries always on the lookout for labour markets to absorb its ever expanding labour force that its regressive economy cannot absorb.

Within countries of origin, neoliberal economics only benefit the ruling elites that include the big traders of imported goods, exporters of raw materials and agricultural produce, local partners of giant multinational mining corporations, and the local land-owning classes. Through the labour export program used to prop up the constantly flagging economy and diffuse the social volcano created by an impoverished majority, the local elites not only maintain the status quo but even profit further from the labour export-related businesses recruitment agencies, financing agencies, medical facilities, and even real estates.

In receiving countries, migrants and immigrants are used as bargaining chips for capitalists to depress the wage of all workers, erode labour rights and even destroy unions. Migration ensures profits while the local working class and their families struggle for survival.

Current migration also demonstrates the inequities existing between men and women. For the past decades, female migration has shoot up and even surpassed male migration in some areas. This so-called “feminization” of migration is not an indication of uplifting the economic participation of women but is an indication of the worsening condition of women in sending countries. It also shows the contraction of overseas labour market that is now focused more on jobs perceived to be for women domestic work, care industry, and jobs in the service sector.

With a nominal recognition that neoliberal globalization has not brought development for the people, the United Nations, in 2000, formulated the Millennium Development Goals that consisted of concrete targets on major development themes.

Now, with just over a year before the target completion of the MDGs on 2015 comes, confidence on the delivery of the MDGs in the context of worsening and protracted economic, food, financial and climate crisis is not high.

When the MDGs were formulated, migration was not discussed as a context or as a theme to be addressed. In fact, even the 2013 Report on the MDGs did not mention the condition of migrants, immigrants and families as a measure of how the development goals are faring.

While the UN remains optimistic of the MDGs, the fact remains that since the MDG was formulated, international migration increased from 175 million to 232 million. In 1990 when conferences that served as bases of the MDG started, there were 154 million international migrants.

If development is indeed getting propelled, why is migration that even UN member states recognize as a forced one still very much on the rise?

Ironically, instead of treating migration as a development problem, it is now being considered as a development opportunity. The World Bank, various UN agencies and other multilateral and multi-stakeholder bodies such as the Global Forum on Migration and Development, all choose to emphasize the enormous contribution of migration for development. They are advancing the flawed strategy of using remittance as a motor for development: be it as part of the GDP, as a credit-rating booster, or as a means to increase social capital through economic capacity given to households of migrants.

Remittance that is even greater than official development aid and second only to foreign direct investments is targeted as a source of “new and additional” financing for sustainable development.

It is disturbing that current discussions on the Post-MDG agenda are geared towards developing and further systematizing migration and labour export programs. Migrant-sending countries are markedly pushing for an increase in migration flows and the lowering of restrictions in destination countries. Host countries, meanwhile, are pushing to attract skilled workers and professionals an agenda they’ve had since the GATS Mode 4 was introduced and is now being continued in the TISA negotiations and are perfecting their temporary workers/ guest workers programs.

The myth of migration for development is set to be perpetuated and further reinforced by its integration into the so-called Post-2015 development agenda.
The UN Global Migration Group (GMG) writes,
“The post-2015 UN Development Agenda provides a unique opportunity to remedy this omission [of migration in the MDGs]. Now that migration has become a global phenomenon affecting almost all countries in the world, and in view of its crucial links with development, the GMG believes that migration must become an integral part of the post-2015 UN Development Agenda, including through its integration in goals and targets, monitored by specific and appropriate indicators.”
Based on the ongoing deliberations in the inter-governmental Open Working Group (OWG) tasked to come up with a new set of global sustainable development goals (SDGs), there are three ways in which migration is being incorporated in the Post-2015 development agenda.

First is encouraging more migration. Pakistan, for instance has proposed increasing global migration flows by 10% by 2030, particularly of skilled labour from lower income to higher income countries supposedly to reduce inequality between countries. The Group of Least Developed Countries (LDCs) likewise calls to remove restrictions on labor migration and deepen short-term, circular migration, particularly for migrant workers from LDCs.
Second, there are numerous proposals to increase remittance flows including reduction of transactions costs associated with these flows.

Third, there are a number of proposed targets meant to protect the rights of migrants, provide social protection, end discrimination and violence against migrants and refugees among other vulnerable groups. These also include proposals to end illegal trafficking.

It is becoming apparent that integrating migration into the Post-2015 development agenda is not about ensuring the end of forced migration and the conditions that perpetuate the super-exploitation of migrants. It is about facilitating, systematizing and legitimizing labor export that adheres to the neoliberal globalization prescriptions of labour flexibilization, justifying government cutbacks on social spending, and ostensibly protecting the rights of migrant and refugees without addressing the repressive measures in place in receiving countries.

While the UN GMG and their civil society partners, at best, profess to address the particular needs and problems of migrants as a growing demographic segment of the population that is vulnerable and marginalized, they also serve to instrumentalize migration for global capitalist accumulation.

Neoliberal globalization as a framework has only worsened the condition that forces people to migrate for survival and transgresses on the dignity of migrants. Radical shifts are needed if the Post-2015 development agenda are to induce a just, equitable and sustainable development for the people.

Development justice is the transformative development framework that aims to address the inequities between countries, between the rich and poor within countries, and between men and women that maintain the current nature of migration and the exploitation of migrants.

Through the following foundational shifts composing development justice, the condition for a development that shall address forced migration can be created:

1. Redistributive Justice will ensure that in countries of origin, resources and opportunities can be accessed by the people, and they will not be forced to seek them overseas

2. Economic Justice will ensure decent living including decent living for immigrants and their families in countries of destination

3. Social Justice eliminates all forms of discrimination and marginalization including the economic, political and social exclusion of migrants and immigrants in the host countries

4. Environmental Justice presses countries and elites historically responsible for climate degradation to own up to their greater responsibility to stop environmentally damaging production and consumption

5. Accountability to the People that will ensure that migrants are part of free, prior, and informed decision making in all stages of development processes.

Migrants should be present in the development discussions. We were left behind when development goals were set. We were still left behind when actions to achieve the set goals were implemented.

We shall make sure that in the post-2015 development agenda, migrants as stakeholders are involved and migration as a problem of maldevelopment is addressed.++

A world without forced migration Why migrants should support the call for development justice International Migrants Alliance (IMA) Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development Currently, there are 232 million international migrants in the world and this is projected to increase in the coming years. This includes migrant workers and immigrants who are mainly in agriculture, industries and the service sector. This number does not yet include the millions more irregular (or undocumented) migrants, as well as refugees. Present-day migration is a result of inequities existing in the world perpetuated by policies of neoliberal globalization. Migration pattern is mainly characterized by migration from less developed countries to the more developed ones such as the migration of people from Latin American and the Caribbean to North America, from Southeast Asia to the richer countries of East Asia, from South Asia to the Middle East, or Eastern Europe to Russia and to Western Europe. The past four decades of implementing neoliberal globalization policies has deepened the maldevelopment of third world countries. The destruction of agriculture, deindustrialization, and contraction of public social services in the country of origin of migrants has led to mass displacement, dislocation and forced migration. It has also heightened the need for a more “flexible” skilled, cheap, disempowered labour force that are sourced from the less developed countries always on the lookout for labour markets to absorb its ever expanding labour force that its regressive economy cannot absorb. Within countries of origin, neoliberal economics only benefit the ruling elites that include the big traders of imported goods, exporters of raw materials and agricultural produce, local partners of giant multinational mining corporations, and the local land-owning classes. Through the labour export program used to prop up the constantly flagging economy and diffuse the social volcano created by an impoverished majority, the local elites not only maintain the status quo but even profit further from the labour export-related businesses recruitment agencies, financing agencies, medical facilities, and even real estates. In receiving countries, migrants and immigrants are used as bargaining chips for capitalists to depress the wage of all workers, erode labour rights and even destroy unions. Migration ensures profits while the local working class and their families struggle for survival. Current migration also demonstrates the inequities existing between men and women. For the past decades, female migration has shoot up and even surpassed male migration in some areas. This so-called “feminization” of migration is not an indication of uplifting the economic participation of women but is an indication of the worsening condition of women in sending countries. It also shows the contraction of overseas labour market that is now focused more on jobs perceived to be for women domestic work, care industry, and jobs in the service sector. With a nominal recognition that neoliberal globalization has not brought development for the people, the United Nations, in 2000, formulated the Millennium Development Goals that consisted of concrete targets on major development themes. Now, with just over a year before the target completion of the MDGs on 2015 comes, confidence on the delivery of the MDGs in the context of worsening and protracted economic, food, financial and climate crisis is not high. When the MDGs were formulated, migration was not discussed as a context or as a theme to be addressed. In fact, even the 2013 Report on the MDGs did not mention the condition of migrants, immigrants and families as a measure of how the development goals are faring. While the UN remains optimistic of the MDGs, the fact remains that since the MDG was formulated, international migration increased from 175 million to 232 million. In 1990 when conferences that served as bases of the MDG started, there were 154 million international migrants. If development is indeed getting propelled, why is migration that even UN member states recognize as a forced one still very much on the rise? Ironically, instead of treating migration as a development problem, it is now being considered as a development opportunity. The World Bank, various UN agencies and other multilateral and multi-stakeholder bodies such as the Global Forum on Migration and Development, all choose to emphasize the enormous contribution of migration for development. They are advancing the flawed strategy of using remittance as a motor for development: be it as part of the GDP, as a credit-rating booster, or as a means to increase social capital through economic capacity given to households of migrants. Remittance that is even greater than official development aid and second only to foreign direct investments is targeted as a source of “new and additional” financing for sustainable development. It is disturbing that current discussions on the Post-MDG agenda are geared towards developing and further systematizing migration and labour export programs. Migrant-sending countries are markedly pushing for an increase in migration flows and the lowering of restrictions in destination countries. Host countries, meanwhile, are pushing to attract skilled workers and professionals an agenda they’ve had since the GATS Mode 4 was introduced and is now being continued in the TISA negotiations and are perfecting their temporary workers/ guest workers programs. The myth of migration for development is set to be perpetuated and further reinforced by its integration into the so-called Post-2015 development agenda. The UN Global Migration Group (GMG) writes, “The post-2015 UN Development Agenda provides a unique opportunity to remedy this omission [of migration in the MDGs]. Now that migration has become a global phenomenon affecting almost all countries in the world, and in view of its crucial links with development, the GMG believes that migration must become an integral part of the post-2015 UN Development Agenda, including through its integration in goals and targets, monitored by specific and appropriate indicators.” Based on the ongoing deliberations in the inter-governmental Open Working Group (OWG) tasked to come up with a new set of global sustainable development goals (SDGs), there are three ways in which migration is being incorporated in the Post-2015 development agenda. First is encouraging more migration. Pakistan, for instance has proposed increasing global migration flows by 10% by 2030, particularly of skilled labour from lower income to higher income countries supposedly to reduce inequality between countries. The Group of Least Developed Countries (LDCs) likewise calls to remove restrictions on labor migration and deepen short-term, circular migration, particularly for migrant workers from LDCs. Second, there are numerous proposals to increase remittance flows including reduction of transactions costs associated with these flows. Third, there are a number of proposed targets meant to protect the rights of migrants, provide social protection, end discrimination and violence against migrants and refugees among other vulnerable groups. These also include proposals to end illegal trafficking. It is becoming apparent that integrating migration into the Post-2015 development agenda is not about ensuring the end of forced migration and the conditions that perpetuate the super-exploitation of migrants. It is about facilitating, systematizing and legitimizing labor export that adheres to the neoliberal globalization prescriptions of labour flexibilization, justifying government cutbacks on social spending, and ostensibly protecting the rights of migrant and refugees without addressing the repressive measures in place in receiving countries. While the UN GMG and their civil society partners, at best, profess to address the particular needs and problems of migrants as a growing demographic segment of the population that is vulnerable and marginalized, they also serve to instrumentalize migration for global capitalist accumulation. Neoliberal globalization as a framework has only worsened the condition that forces people to migrate for survival and transgresses on the dignity of migrants. Radical shifts are needed if the Post-2015 development agenda are to induce a just, equitable and sustainable development for the people. Development justice is the transformative development framework that aims to address the inequities between countries, between the rich and poor within countries, and between men and women that maintain the current nature of migration and the exploitation of migrants. Through the following foundational shifts composing development justice, the condition for a development that shall address forced migration can be created: 1. Redistributive Justice will ensure that in countries of origin, resources and opportunities can be accessed by the people, and they will not be forced to seek them overseas 2. Economic Justice will ensure decent living including decent living for immigrants and their families in countries of destination 3. Social Justice eliminates all forms of discrimination and marginalization including the economic, political and social exclusion of migrants and immigrants in the host countries 4. Environmental Justice presses countries and elites historically responsible for climate degradation to own up to their greater responsibility to stop environmentally damaging production and consumption 5. Accountability to the People that will ensure that migrants are part of free, prior, and informed decision making in all stages of development processes. Migrants should be present in the development discussions. We were left behind when development goals were set. We were still left behind when actions to achieve the set goals were implemented. We shall make sure that in the post-2015 development agenda, migrants as stakeholders are involved and migration as a problem of maldevelopment is addressed.++

A world without forced migration
Why migrants should support the call for development justice
International Migrants Alliance (IMA)
Campaign for People’s Goals for Sustainable Development

Currently, there are 232 million international migrants in the world and this is projected to increase in the coming years. This includes migrant workers and immigrants who are mainly in agriculture, industries and the service sector. This number does not yet include the millions more irregular (or undocumented) migrants, as well as refugees.

Present-day migration is a result of inequities existing in the world perpetuated by policies of neoliberal globalization.

Migration pattern is mainly characterized by migration from less developed countries to the more developed ones such as the migration of people from Latin American and the Caribbean to North America, from Southeast Asia to the richer countries of East Asia, from South Asia to the Middle East, or Eastern Europe to Russia and to Western Europe.

The past four decades of implementing neoliberal globalization policies has deepened the maldevelopment of third world countries. The destruction of agriculture, deindustrialization, and contraction of public social services in the country of origin of migrants has led to mass displacement, dislocation and forced migration.

It has also heightened the need for a more “flexible” skilled, cheap, disempowered labour force that are sourced from the less developed countries always on the lookout for labour markets to absorb its ever expanding labour force that its regressive economy cannot absorb.

Within countries of origin, neoliberal economics only benefit the ruling elites that include the big traders of imported goods, exporters of raw materials and agricultural produce, local partners of giant multinational mining corporations, and the local land-owning classes. Through the labour export program used to prop up the constantly flagging economy and diffuse the social volcano created by an impoverished majority, the local elites not only maintain the status quo but even profit further from the labour export-related businesses recruitment agencies, financing agencies, medical facilities, and even real estates.

In receiving countries, migrants and immigrants are used as bargaining chips for capitalists to depress the wage of all workers, erode labour rights and even destroy unions. Migration ensures profits while the local working class and their families struggle for survival.

Current migration also demonstrates the inequities existing between men and women. For the past decades, female migration has shoot up and even surpassed male migration in some areas. This so-called “feminization” of migration is not an indication of uplifting the economic participation of women but is an indication of the worsening condition of women in sending countries. It also shows the contraction of overseas labour market that is now focused more on jobs perceived to be for women domestic work, care industry, and jobs in the service sector.

With a nominal recognition that neoliberal globalization has not brought development for the people, the United Nations, in 2000, formulated the Millennium Development Goals that consisted of concrete targets on major development themes.

Now, with just over a year before the target completion of the MDGs on 2015 comes, confidence on the delivery of the MDGs in the context of worsening and protracted economic, food, financial and climate crisis is not high.

When the MDGs were formulated, migration was not discussed as a context or as a theme to be addressed. In fact, even the 2013 Report on the MDGs did not mention the condition of migrants, immigrants and families as a measure of how the development goals are faring.

While the UN remains optimistic of the MDGs, the fact remains that since the MDG was formulated, international migration increased from 175 million to 232 million. In 1990 when conferences that served as bases of the MDG started, there were 154 million international migrants.

If development is indeed getting propelled, why is migration that even UN member states recognize as a forced one still very much on the rise?

Ironically, instead of treating migration as a development problem, it is now being considered as a development opportunity. The World Bank, various UN agencies and other multilateral and multi-stakeholder bodies such as the Global Forum on Migration and Development, all choose to emphasize the enormous contribution of migration for development. They are advancing the flawed strategy of using remittance as a motor for development: be it as part of the GDP, as a credit-rating booster, or as a means to increase social capital through economic capacity given to households of migrants.

Remittance that is even greater than official development aid and second only to foreign direct investments is targeted as a source of “new and additional” financing for sustainable development.

It is disturbing that current discussions on the Post-MDG agenda are geared towards developing and further systematizing migration and labour export programs. Migrant-sending countries are markedly pushing for an increase in migration flows and the lowering of restrictions in destination countries. Host countries, meanwhile, are pushing to attract skilled workers and professionals an agenda they’ve had since the GATS Mode 4 was introduced and is now being continued in the TISA negotiations and are perfecting their temporary workers/ guest workers programs.

The myth of migration for development is set to be perpetuated and further reinforced by its integration into the so-called Post-2015 development agenda.
The UN Global Migration Group (GMG) writes,
“The post-2015 UN Development Agenda provides a unique opportunity to remedy this omission [of migration in the MDGs]. Now that migration has become a global phenomenon affecting almost all countries in the world, and in view of its crucial links with development, the GMG believes that migration must become an integral part of the post-2015 UN Development Agenda, including through its integration in goals and targets, monitored by specific and appropriate indicators.”
Based on the ongoing deliberations in the inter-governmental Open Working Group (OWG) tasked to come up with a new set of global sustainable development goals (SDGs), there are three ways in which migration is being incorporated in the Post-2015 development agenda.

First is encouraging more migration. Pakistan, for instance has proposed increasing global migration flows by 10% by 2030, particularly of skilled labour from lower income to higher income countries supposedly to reduce inequality between countries. The Group of Least Developed Countries (LDCs) likewise calls to remove restrictions on labor migration and deepen short-term, circular migration, particularly for migrant workers from LDCs.
Second, there are numerous proposals to increase remittance flows including reduction of transactions costs associated with these flows.

Third, there are a number of proposed targets meant to protect the rights of migrants, provide social protection, end discrimination and violence against migrants and refugees among other vulnerable groups. These also include proposals to end illegal trafficking.

It is becoming apparent that integrating migration into the Post-2015 development agenda is not about ensuring the end of forced migration and the conditions that perpetuate the super-exploitation of migrants. It is about facilitating, systematizing and legitimizing labor export that adheres to the neoliberal globalization prescriptions of labour flexibilization, justifying government cutbacks on social spending, and ostensibly protecting the rights of migrant and refugees without addressing the repressive measures in place in receiving countries.

While the UN GMG and their civil society partners, at best, profess to address the particular needs and problems of migrants as a growing demographic segment of the population that is vulnerable and marginalized, they also serve to instrumentalize migration for global capitalist accumulation.

Neoliberal globalization as a framework has only worsened the condition that forces people to migrate for survival and transgresses on the dignity of migrants. Radical shifts are needed if the Post-2015 development agenda are to induce a just, equitable and sustainable development for the people.

Development justice is the transformative development framework that aims to address the inequities between countries, between the rich and poor within countries, and between men and women that maintain the current nature of migration and the exploitation of migrants.

Through the following foundational shifts composing development justice, the condition for a development that shall address forced migration can be created:

1. Redistributive Justice will ensure that in countries of origin, resources and opportunities can be accessed by the people, and they will not be forced to seek them overseas

2. Economic Justice will ensure decent living including decent living for immigrants and their families in countries of destination

3. Social Justice eliminates all forms of discrimination and marginalization including the economic, political and social exclusion of migrants and immigrants in the host countries

4. Environmental Justice presses countries and elites historically responsible for climate degradation to own up to their greater responsibility to stop environmentally damaging production and consumption

5. Accountability to the People that will ensure that migrants are part of free, prior, and informed decision making in all stages of development processes.

Migrants should be present in the development discussions. We were left behind when development goals were set. We were still left behind when actions to achieve the set goals were implemented.

We shall make sure that in the post-2015 development agenda, migrants as stakeholders are involved and migration as a problem of maldevelopment is addressed.++

With you, I am well pleased

Sermon Title: “With you, I am well pleased” UCCP Maasin City, Southern Leyte 10 January 2021 Texts: Isaiah 55: 1-13; Mark 1: 4-11 Isaiah 55:...